A challenge is issued to academe to:

     1.) Offer a better explanation than Pulsoid Theory for the current enigmas that result from the irreconcilability of the current Standard Models of physics;

     2.) Find an error in the mathematics or logic of Pulsoid Theory, as presented, that would disqualify it as a leading candidate for a Theory of Everything;

     3.) Debate that current theoretical physics is based upon other than:
          a.) Forces/interactions that, as defined by Standard Models, are
                entirely metaphysical;
          b.) Time that is undefined; and, c.) mathematics that is "incomplete";

     4.) Debate that the Elliptical Constant does not underlie:
          a.) the definition of fundamental, intrinsic time (FIT);
          b.) The ellipsoidal form of fundamental quanta;
          c.) The Natural geometric source of numbers . . . including
                a Proof of One within any given Natural system.

Or, more simply, disprove that there is not an Elliptical Constant, for any elliptical shape, that is not related to, or analogous to, the Planck Constants. That is: more simply, demonstrate that the Elliptical Constant is not the Rosetta Stone that underlies a rationalization for all the phenomena of everything that exists; as well as, demonstrating the logic for the radius of Infinity.

Since May 1955 no physicist "of stature" from academe has accepted a public debate, or a private debate, with an eclectic group of scholars, concerning the mathematical, philosophical, or scientific premises of Pulsoid Theory. During the intervening years, since 1955, many of the contentious arguments that have been offered as provocations for such debate have, themselves, become part of mainstream, intellectual, academic, theoretical acceptance.

To avoid conceding a point made concerning the mass of neutrinos, long argued with Fred Reines, the standard definition of the ephemeral "particle" was quietly changed by academe just in time make Fred a Nobel Laureat before he died. In similar manner, the ludicrous definition of black holes, also, appears to be morphing. No longer, soon after the 1990 launching of the Hubble space telescope (HST), do astronomers dismiss accelerating, galactic recession; nor, do cosmologists refute the possibility of "dark" energy and "dark" matter.

Despite observation and logic to the contrary, the mass media, trade media, scientific journals, and many world-class scientists still speak of massive black holes at the center of galaxies and elsewhere as fact without disclaimers to the contrary stating that: black holes are theoretical. The impression that infinitesimal black holes abound is about as common an accepted understanding as are the tenets of Christianity.

Despite observation and logic to the contrary, the mass media, trade media, scientific journals, and many world-class scientists still speak of massive black holes at the center of galaxies and elsewhere as fact without disclaimers to the contrary stating that: black holes are theoretical. The impression that infinitesimal black holes abound is about as common an accepted understanding as are the tenets of Christianity.

 
Theoretical physics is constrained with its acceptance of the Big Bang as a Standard Model. Cosmology, if not all of physics, is irreconcilable until an alternative, structural force that opposes gravity's illusion of "attraction-at-a-distance" replaces the Big Bang concept of centripetal forces; thus as it is, the compressive force of dark matter and dark energy must be a requirement as the reactive force to Cosmic Inertia rather than the "Voodoo attraction" of "common gravity."

Recently, the Nobel Prize was shared (October 3, 2006) for strong verification of George Gamov's "Big Bang"; yet, no academic astrophysicist can explain how one "bang" created the acceleration that was observed by the Hubble Space Telescope more than a decade earlier, concerning galactic recession.

Nor, do many post modern physicists speculate as Sir Fred Hoyle did in 1955 about the vessel that contained the Big Bang.

Pulsoid Theory is a philosophy of ultimate reduction, Philogic, that depends upon rigorous logic and definitions; reconciliation with both scientific observation and most of prior physical theory; and, most importantly, Pulsoid Theory is understandable by most laypersons. As such, Pulsoid Theory is truly . . . a Paradigm Shift!
 

ADDENDUM
 

A response to “A Challenge to Academe” could take the form of disproving the following argument and statement:

The mathematical descriptions, of the harmonies and resonances of motion, described by Pulsoid Theory, that heuristically describe the ellipsoidal geometry of “string-like” oscillating phenomena, are applicable to establishing fundamental concepts that can resurrect the much maligned string theory and its derivations; as well as, reinforcing the concepts of loop quantum gravity theories of “space.”
 

Inscribe Circle nop within PythagoreanTriangle DEF and
Inscribe Circle rst within Pythagorean Triangle HJL.

Radius mn = Radius qr = x - e

The radius of a Circle inscribed within a Triangle
equals one-half of the side, a, plus the base, b,
minus the diagonal, c.

(a + b - c)/2
 

!PHi/images/POc-19d.gif
The identical inscribed circles
(3-dimensional Resoloids)
are within two
unequal Pythagorean Triangles.

The diameters and radii of
the two identical inscribed circles
are, respectively, equal to the
radius, r, Line EF, minus e
and the Pulse, P,
Lines AD, BE, CH and CJ minus e.
x - e = Resoloid radius (Rr) = Line tu

The two don't talk physics much at home, she said. She's interested in geometrical approaches to  space and time, and he thinks algebraically. "When he starts talking about (exotic kinds of) algebras, I just think, 'Yuuuccckk.' " 'A Lot of It's Guesswork'  Patricia Schwarz (the Official String Theory Web Site) with reference to her husband John H. Schwarz Los Angeles Times, November 17, 1999

Pulsoid Theory's Emergent Ellipsoid, is three dimensional, and defined by its Pulse and Vectors, which Pulse is any base 10 integer greater than One and less than Infinity and The Vectors, which are 1/2 the Major Diameter. The Emegent Ellipsoid symbolizes matter from its emegence to its dissipation. The Pulse is a force that begins with Dynamic Emergent Separation (DES) at the Infinitesimal and contiues to complete dissipation at the Infinite. The infinite and infinitesimal are congruent, Infinity, which phenomenon is referred to as Infinite Dynamics; or,simply Infinity.                 The Vector will always be the square of the Pulse, which manifests as the Inverse Square Law.

All theories ought to lend themselves to a description so simple that even a child could understand. Albert Einstein [1878-1955] Science News September 20, 2003, page 186

Since the mathematicians have invaded the theory of relativity, I do not understand it myself anymore. Albert Einstein [1878-1955] Discover Magazine August 2003

 

The Golden Ratio, the Fibonacci Sequence, and every other property of the Emergent Ellipsoid's oscillations are found at every scale of the Universe that is fundamentally observable; or, reliably detectable from inference.  Thus, it is difficult to conclude any thing other than the Pulsoid (symbolized by the Emergent Ellipsoid) is very near the First Postulate of The Theory of Everything (ToE).

The evolution from the Pulsoid's beginning to its recyclable ending resolves most of the enigmas of Science, Theology, and Philosophy.  Thus, Philogic. IPSO Facto!

.."Seek simplicity; and
....... . . Natural integers."

..........Challenge to Academe
...The Purpose of Pulsoid Theory

....c² = 2v² – s²......v = εP²


 

Please ask questions With questions it’s possible to know if comments are logical and convincing; or whether clarification is required.